Page 307 - Cyber Defense eMagazine September 2025

measure success. The security-versus-speed dilemma is often a symptom of misaligned incentives rather
than technical limitations.

While some security-speed conflicts are genuine and unavoidable, many organizations create false
choices through outdated governance structures, risk-averse cultures, and siloed decision-making
processes.

Why Smart Organizations Keep Making Dumb Choices

The persistence of security-speed conflicts reveals fundamental flaws in how enterprises approach
technological decisions:

Budget Structure Problems: Security and operations have separate budgets, creating artificial
competition for resources rather than collaborative investment in shared outcomes.

Risk Culture Misalignment: Security teams are penalized for incidents but not rewarded for enabling
business velocity, while operations teams face pressure for speed but limited accountability for security
outcomes.

KPI Disconnection: Success metrics rarely account for interdependence between security and
operational efficiency, leading to suboptimal decisions that look good on individual scorecards.

These flawed structures persist because changing them requires short-term pain for long-term gain.
CFOs resist unified budgets because they complicate financial tracking. Security leaders fear losing
autonomy over risk decisions. Operations teams worry about accountability for incidents they can't
control.

But here's the uncomfortable question: Are these structural problems, or do they reflect genuine technical
realities?

The Adaptive Security Counter-Argument

Some security professionals argue that speed pressure inevitably leads to dangerous shortcuts. They
contend that adaptive approaches are sophisticated ways to rationalize compromised security.

The Skeptical View: "Context-aware security sounds appealing, but real-world implementation means
someone - usually business stakeholders - decides what constitutes 'acceptable risk.' This invariably
leads to gradual erosion of security standards under business pressure."

The Technical Reality: Adaptive security implementations require significant upfront investment in
infrastructure, tooling, and expertise. Organizations lacking technical maturity may implement these
approaches poorly, creating an illusion of security while introducing new vulnerabilities.

Cyber Defense eMagazine – September 2025 Edition 307
Copyright © 2025, Cyber Defense Magazine. All rights reserved worldwide.