Page 202 - Cyber Defense eMagazine RSAC Special Edition 2025
P. 202

AI Cyber Risk – and Responsibility – Are Mounting

            Federal Chief AI Officers (CAIOs) overwhelmingly agree on the transformative potential of AI – 85% say
            it will transform agency operations by 2030. But cybersecurity and risk management have become central
            to the AI conversation: 57% of CAIOs rank implementing security, privacy, and risk management as a
            top-three priority for 2025.

            Additionally, just 29% of CAIOs say they currently have the authority needed to advocate for meaningful
            change. And 66% report their agency lacks the infrastructure, talent, and funding to meet AI goals.


            These  shortfalls  can  significantly  impact  cyber  posture.  Unsecured  models,  unvetted  tools,  and
            fragmented governance all increase the surface area for attack. With more AI tools in play, the risk isn’t
            abstract – it’s operational.



            Growing Governance Alongside Execution

            CAIOs report strong internal backing for AI governance and compliance – currently their most supported
            initiative  area.  But  support  drops  off  sharply  for  more  strategic  needs.  Scaling  infrastructure  and
            computing, expanding AI talent, and strengthening interagency collaboration all rank as some of the
            lowest on the leadership support scale – even though they’re critical for secure implementation.

            The takeaway is clear: governance isn’t just red tape – it’s the roadmap. But without infrastructure and
            talent to execute, that roadmap leads nowhere.



            Security Starts with Authority

            The report highlights a leadership paradox: while 88% of CAIOs hold multiple titles, 100% say the CAIO
            role  should  be  full-time  and  stand-alone.  Lack  of  structural  authority  is  slowing  progress  –  and
            cybersecurity is caught in the fallout.

            Agencies operating in compliance-first mode may appear risk-aware, but there are blind spots – pilot
            tools  that  aren’t  hardened,  AI  services  without  defined  ownership,  and  models  that  operate  outside
            enterprise visibility. As AI use grows, so does the risk of unmanaged endpoints and shadow AI.



            Scaling AI Without Breaking Trust


            Agencies  that  have  started  scaling  AI  are  seeing  results.  But  these  scaling  efforts  should  include
            foundational cybersecurity planning, from the onset – and as use cases increase in complexity.

            Integration with legacy systems remains a major challenge, with 50% of CAIOs citing it as a top barrier.
            That’s a critical inflection point: every legacy interface added to an AI implementation increases the
            likelihood of vulnerability. And as data quality and accessibility issues persist – identified by 67% of CAIOs
            – AI tools may be built on shaky ground, further compounding cybersecurity concerns.





                                                                                                            202
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207