Warning: Illegal string offset 'thumbnail_type' in /home/cyberdefensemag/public_html/wp-content/themes/Magazon/st-framework/templates/single.php on line 46
By Pierluigi Paganini, Editor-in-Chief, CDM
May 09, 2013, 11:30 am EST
Bloomberg published a report on QinetiQ data breach, the company has been compromised from 2007 to 2012 by Chinese hackers.
The UK-based defense contractor QinetiQ is vulnerable to cyber attacks, the news is sensational and has created a lot of noise on the Internet, due the critical role of the company as primary providers for U.S. Governments.
The source of intelligence confirmed that QinetiQ was not able to defend classified documents and technological information from cyber espionage having Chinese origin.
QinetiQ North America (QQ) is a world leading defense technology and security company that provides technological equipment such as satellites, drones and software services to the U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan and Middle East Area.
Bloomberg revealed that the attacks dates Ciback to 2007 when the NCIS (Naval Criminal Investigation Service) warned allegedly about the possible data breach from two staffers’ laptops, and the incidents weren’t isolated, they continued throughout 2008 and 2009.
Several incidents have occurred without attracting attention and concern on the part of the company’s management. The data are surprising, according Bloomberg more than 13,000 server passwords were stolen and used to acquire sensitive information and more than 3.3 million pages of Microsoft Excel spreadsheets were exposed.
The investigation revealed a disturbing scenario, around 1.3 million pages of documents, many of them including secret military information were stolen, but the news more concerning is that probably other contractors were hacked.
Chinese hackers belonging to Comment Crew have conducted an extended operation to steal the sensitive information, the campaigns started on 2009 when the hackers compromised at least 151 machines of the company Technology Solutions Group (TSG), a QinetiQ NA division, the attacks lasted around 251 days during which they have stolen 20 gigabytes of data before being blocked. Mandiant identified the Comment Crew as the People’s Liberation Army Unit 61398.
“Over one stretch in 2009, the spies spent 251 days raiding at least 151 machines, including laptops and servers, cataloging TSG’s source code and engineering data,”.
, “The hackers dribbled data out of the network in small packets to avoid detection, managing to get away with 20 gigabytes before they were finally stopped, according to an internal damage assessment.”
The hackers exploited from 2007 to 2010 unpatched security flaws and other vulnerabilities (e.g. Lack of two-factor authentication) to infiltrate various divisions of QinetiQ such as Cyveillance, the corporate cybersecurity unit.
On the theft of digital secrets Bloomberg reports:
“In four days of furious activity, the hackers rifled at least 14 servers, taking particular interest in the company’s Pittsburgh location, which specialized in advanced robotics design. The Comment Group also used Back’s password to raid the computer of QinetiQ’s Huntsville, Alabama-based technology control officer, which contained an inventory of highly sensitive weapons-systems technology and source code throughout the company. The spies had got their hands on a map to all of QinetiQ’s digital secrets.”
News of a data breach was reported in the emails leaked from security firm HBGary in 2011, HBGary was hired by QinetiQ to investigate on the data breach. The email revealed that a large amount of data on sensitive technologies were exposed due a series of malware based attacks apparently having Chinese origin that might have caused the loss, in economic terms, for billions of dollars.
“My feeling is that if an attacker has been in your environment for years, your data is gone,” “Everything about your business is known, cataloged, analyzed, by your enemy,” Wallisch wrote. “I don’t feel a sense of urgency anymore.”
HBGary’s principal investigator Phil Wallisch, wrote in an e-mail to a colleague in December 2010, curious that same HBGary suffered one of the most popular data breach in the same period.
According security experts QinetiQ committed the serious error to restrict the investigation on the first discovery of data breach despite it was informed on possible compression of its systems. The NASA reported QinetiQ that it was being attacked by hackers from one of its machines, but apparently the warning was not followed, once again in the discussion there is the need to share information on cyber attacks to mitigate the cyber threats.
Another shocking news revealed by Bloomberg is that QinetiQ NA hired consultancy Mandiant in 2012 but ignored its security advices for example when the security firm in March 2010 discovered an intrusion in QinetiQ network made by Comment Crew hackers.
“Comment Crew had “gained almost complete control over the company’s network. They had operated unhindered for months-long stretches and they had implanted multiple, hidden communications channels to extract data. Privately, the investigators concluded that the spies had gotten everything they wanted from QinetiQ’s computers.” Bloomberg reported.
This is a sad story made worse if we consider that QinetiQiIn May 2012 received a $4.7 million cyber-security contract from the U.S. Transportation Department, To them the company has been entrusted various missions including protection of the country’s critical transport infrastructure.
“When it comes to cyber security QinetiQ couldn’t grab their ass with both hands, so it cracks me up that they won,” Bob Slapnik, vice president at HBGary, wrote after QinetiQ received a grant from the Pentagon in 2010 to advise it on ways to counter cyber espionage.
Hopefully someone have experience of what happened, the cyber security is a national need not occasion for profit.
(Source: CDM & Security Affairs – Cyber espionage)